Show table of content Hide table of content
When social media influencer Saffron Boswell decided to stop cooking ten years ago, few could have predicted her lifestyle choice would become a defining trait of her online persona. The 26-year-old British influencer, now living in Brentwood after a stint in Los Angeles, spends approximately 500 euros weekly on takeout meals—a lifestyle that has fascinated and divided her followers.
Why this influencer chooses takeout over home cooking
Saffron Boswell’s decision to abandon cooking stems from a genuine aversion to culinary activities. “I don’t cook, I really don’t like it at all,” she confesses on her social media platforms. This distaste for kitchen duties developed after her move to Los Angeles a decade ago, marking the beginning of her takeout-only lifestyle.
The financial implications of this choice are substantial. Boswell’s weekly food expenditure reaches approximately 500 euros, translating to about 2,000 euros monthly. In a single day, she might spend over 70 euros across various meals. Her morning typically begins with a hearty English breakfast at a local café, followed by pizza or KFC for lunch. Dinner often comes from Nando’s, the popular South African restaurant chain that has become a favorite among food delivery customers worldwide.
While many might question the economics of such a lifestyle, Boswell maintains a different perspective. “If you cook from scratch, it costs a fortune,” she argues. “I have no intention of spending 60 euros to prepare a dinner that might turn out terrible. That makes no sense to me.” This reasoning reflects her practical approach to food consumption—prioritizing guaranteed satisfaction over potentially wasted efforts.
Her lifestyle choices mirror broader consumer trends in food delivery services, which have seen exponential growth in recent years. With platforms constantly expanding their offerings and digital services raising prices across industries, Boswell’s spending habits represent an extreme version of contemporary consumption patterns.
The economics of permanent takeout living
Despite criticism from followers suggesting home cooking would be more economical, Boswell remains unconvinced. She challenges the common wisdom that preparing meals at home automatically saves money. “People who say it’s cheaper to cook are probably just putting chicken nuggets in the oven,” she states. This perspective highlights the often overlooked complexities of food economics, including ingredient waste, cooking equipment costs, and time investment.
The influencer’s financial calculations extend beyond direct monetary comparisons. For Boswell, the value equation includes factors like convenience, time savings, and mental well-being. “Shopping for groceries is stressful, and ordering food removes that stress,” she explains. “My life is so busy that I don’t have time to spend hours at the stove.”
This prioritization of time over money represents a common trade-off for many professionals in high-paced environments. While some might view Boswell’s choices as extravagant, others recognize the value proposition in outsourcing time-consuming tasks. Her story shares similarities with cases of individuals making unconventional financial choices that ultimately transform their lives, like the California homeless man who invested his last dollars in a lottery ticket that changed his fortune.
The economics of Boswell’s lifestyle also reflect broader market realities. The restaurant and food delivery industry has evolved to efficiently serve single individuals, sometimes making home cooking comparatively expensive for those not feeding families. Scale economies benefit commercial food preparation in ways individual consumers cannot match.
Health considerations and lifestyle balance
Critics of Boswell’s takeout-dependent lifestyle often raise health concerns. Restaurant meals typically contain higher levels of sodium, saturated fats, and calories than home-cooked alternatives. However, Boswell insists she maintains good health despite her unconventional eating habits.
The influencer’s approach represents one extreme in the spectrum of food preparation choices. While nutritionists generally recommend home cooking for optimal dietary control, the quality and variety of takeout options have improved significantly in recent years. Many restaurants now offer health-conscious menu items, allowing consumers like Boswell to make more balanced choices within their preferred consumption model.
Her lifestyle choice also reflects a broader societal shift away from traditional domestic skills. Cooking, once considered an essential life skill, has become optional for many in developed economies with robust food service sectors. This transformation mirrors other lifestyle changes enabled by technology and service industries, where convenience increasingly trumps tradition.
The digital lifestyle that supports Boswell’s choices remains precarious, however. Just as some have lost digital fortunes through misplaced storage devices, the influencer economy itself experiences volatility that could impact her ability to maintain such expenses.
The future of food consumption patterns
Boswell’s extreme takeout lifestyle may represent an outlier today, but it potentially foreshadows evolving food consumption patterns. As meal delivery services become more efficient and specialized, the economic and convenience gap between home cooking and takeout continues to narrow for many consumers.
The pandemic accelerated this trend, normalizing food delivery and takeout as primary rather than occasional consumption modes. Ghost kitchens, meal subscription services, and specialized delivery platforms have transformed the landscape, making Boswell’s lifestyle choice increasingly accessible to broader segments of the population.
Life Billionaires wear the same clothes every day. It’s not for aesthetics, it’s for productivity.
Whether her approach represents a sustainable long-term lifestyle remains debatable. Financial advisors generally caution against such high recurring discretionary expenses, while nutritionists emphasize the health benefits of home-prepared meals. Yet Boswell’s transparent discussion of her choices provides valuable insight into changing consumption patterns and priorities among younger generations.
As food technology continues evolving and work-life boundaries blur further, more consumers may find themselves reconsidering traditional assumptions about home cooking economics and necessity. Boswell’s lifestyle choice, while extreme, offers a compelling case study in contemporary consumption priorities and the monetization of convenience in modern society.
